fix: Add missing macro guards in task.h #1342
Open
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Add missing conditions to prevent unintended access to certain APIs in task.h - The condition is mentioned in the API description but was absent in the code
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
task.h: Add Missing Macro Guards for Restricted APIsDescription
This pull request adds the missing macro guard conditions in
task.hto restrict access to APIs that are conditionally available. Although these conditions were clearly documented in the API descriptions, they were not enforced in the actual implementation.Adding the guards brings the implementation in line with the documented behavior and prevents unintended API exposure when the corresponding configuration options are disabled.
Test Steps
I have validated the changes using an existing BSP project with FreeRTOS integrated as a submodule. No regressions were observed during testing.
Checklist:
Related Issue
N/A
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.