Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances security and functionality by adding Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ServerController
participant AuthService
participant Sentry
User->>ServerController: Initiate login request
ServerController->>AuthService: Process web request
AuthService->>Sentry: Log error (if any)
AuthService->>User: Return authentication response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 5117f9b. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #32 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 60.11% 31.19% -28.93%
===========================================
Files 19 30 +11
Lines 682 638 -44
Branches 68 54 -14
===========================================
- Hits 410 199 -211
- Misses 272 439 +167
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
The User model and AuthLogin service have been modified to include a new customerId property. This change allows for the association of users with specific customers. The necessary updates have been made to the User model, UserAttributes interface, and UserCreationAttributes interface. Additionally, the AuthLogin service has been updated to handle the customerId parameter when creating a new user. This change ensures that the customerId is properly stored and retrieved when interacting with user data. Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 24
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (19)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- apps/server/.env.example (1 hunks)
- apps/server/package.json (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/instrument.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/util/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/web/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/package.json (2 hunks)
- libs/web/src/db.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/models/User.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/errors.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/routes.test.ts (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
nx.json (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: nx.json:25-25 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T01:45:53.051Z Learning: The `__NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKEN__` placeholder in `nx.json` is intended to be replaced by the actual token using the `scripts/inject-token.sh` script.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/db.ts
[warning] 8-9: libs/web/src/db.ts#L8-L9
Added lines #L8 - L9 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/processors/index.ts
[warning] 2-2: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L2
Added line #L2 was not covered by tests
[warning] 4-4: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L4
Added line #L4 was not covered by tests
[warning] 11-13: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L11-L13
Added lines #L11 - L13 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/instrument.ts
[warning] 2-3: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-8: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L5-L8
Added lines #L5 - L8 were not covered by tests
[warning] 10-12: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L10-L12
Added lines #L10 - L12 were not covered by tests
[warning] 14-14: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L14
Added line #L14 was not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/index.ts
[warning] 3-3: apps/server/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 6-6: apps/server/src/index.ts#L6
Added line #L6 was not covered by tests
[warning] 9-13: apps/server/src/index.ts#L9-L13
Added lines #L9 - L13 were not covered by tests
[warning] 15-19: apps/server/src/index.ts#L15-L19
Added lines #L15 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 21-24: apps/server/src/index.ts#L21-L24
Added lines #L21 - L24 were not covered by tests
[warning] 26-26: apps/server/src/index.ts#L26
Added line #L26 was not covered by testslibs/web/src/models/User.ts
[warning] 40-43: libs/web/src/models/User.ts#L40-L43
Added lines #L40 - L43 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/index.ts
[warning] 3-3: libs/web/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by testslibs/web/src/helpers.ts
[warning] 12-16: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L12-L16
Added lines #L12 - L16 were not covered by tests
[warning] 24-27: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L24-L27
Added lines #L24 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 29-32: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L29-L32
Added lines #L29 - L32 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts
[warning] 2-3: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 12-15: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L12-L15
Added lines #L12 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by tests
[warning] 20-20: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-33: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L24-L33
Added lines #L24 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-46: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L40-L46
Added lines #L40 - L46 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/ServerController.ts
[warning] 7-7: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests
[warning] 19-19: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
Gitleaks
nx.json
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (25)
apps/server/.env.example (2)
1-1: LGTM!The environment variable
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis correctly defined without exposing sensitive information.
2-2: LGTM!The environment variable
SENTRY_DSNis correctly defined without exposing sensitive information.libs/web/index.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM!The
RouteHandlersare correctly exported from./src/processors/index.js.
3-8: LGTM!The error handling entities are correctly exported from
./src/errors.js.
9-9: LGTM!The authentication-related functions are correctly exported from
./src/services/AuthLogin.js.
1-1: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
handleWebRequestshas been renamed toprocessWebRequests. Ensure that all references to this function are updated accordingly.libs/web/src/processors/index.ts (1)
4-13: Ensure test coverage for theRouteHandlersobject.The
RouteHandlersobject maps routes to handler functions. Ensure that each route and corresponding handler function is covered by tests.Verification successful
Test coverage for
RouteHandlersobject is confirmed.The
RouteHandlersobject and theauthenticateUserfunction are adequately covered by tests inlibs/web/test/routes.test.ts.
libs/web/test/routes.test.ts: Tests for the/AuthLoginroute and its handler function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `RouteHandlers`. # Test: Search for test files. Expect: Occurrences of routes and handler functions in test files. rg --type js -A 5 $'RouteHandlers'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `RouteHandlers` and `authenticateUser`. # Search for occurrences of `RouteHandlers` in test files. rg --type js --type ts -A 5 'RouteHandlers' # Search for occurrences of `authenticateUser` in test files. rg --type js --type ts -A 5 'authenticateUser'Length of output: 4217
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 4-4: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L4
Added line #L4 was not covered by tests
[warning] 11-13: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L11-L13
Added lines #L11 - L13 were not covered by testslibs/web/test/errors.test.ts (2)
2-2: Ensure that the imported error classes are tested adequately.The
ErrorMissingCredentialsandErrorUserExistsclasses are imported from@rusty/web. Ensure that these classes are tested adequately.Verification successful
The imported error classes are tested, but the tests might be basic.
The
ErrorMissingCredentialsandErrorUserExistsclasses are referenced in the test filelibs/web/test/errors.test.ts, with tests checking if these classes are defined. However, it is advisable to review and possibly extend these tests to ensure comprehensive coverage.
libs/web/test/errors.test.ts
it("should have an ErrorMissingCredentials class", () => { expect(ErrorMissingCredentials).toBeDefined(); })it("should have an ErrorUserExists class", () => { expect(ErrorUserExists).toBeDefined(); })Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists`. # Test: Search for test files. Expect: Occurrences of `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists` in test files. rg --type js -A 5 $'ErrorMissingCredentials' rg --type js -A 5 $'ErrorUserExists'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists`. # Test: Search for test files. Expect: Occurrences of `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists` in test files. rg --type js,ts -A 5 'ErrorMissingCredentials' rg --type js,ts -A 5 'ErrorUserExists'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists`. # Test: Search for test files. Expect: Occurrences of `ErrorMissingCredentials` and `ErrorUserExists` in test files. rg --type js -A 5 'ErrorMissingCredentials' rg --type ts -A 5 'ErrorMissingCredentials' rg --type js -A 5 'ErrorUserExists' rg --type ts -A 5 'ErrorUserExists'Length of output: 5211
4-10: Ensure that the tests cover all scenarios for error classes.The tests check if the error classes are defined. Ensure that all scenarios for these error classes are covered.
.gitignore (1)
18-18: Good practice: Ignore.envfile.Adding
.envto the.gitignorefile is a good practice to prevent sensitive information from being tracked by Git.apps/server/src/instrument.ts (1)
10-18: Verify Sentry DSN and sampling rates.Ensure that the
SENTRY_DSN,tracesSampleRate, andprofilesSampleRatevalues are correctly set and appropriate for your environment.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 10-12: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L10-L12
Added lines #L10 - L12 were not covered by tests
[warning] 14-14: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L14
Added line #L14 was not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by testslibs/util/package.json (1)
34-35: Dependencies added for Sentry integration.The additions of
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeare approved.However, ensure that these dependencies are correctly used and configured in the codebase.
Verification successful
Dependencies added for Sentry integration have been verified.
The imports for
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeare correctly used and configured in the codebase.
apps/server/src/instrument.tsapps/server/src/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new Sentry dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of `@sentry/node` and `@sentry/profiling-node`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'import * as Sentry from "@sentry/node"' rg --type javascript -A 5 $'import { nodeProfilingIntegration } from "@sentry/profiling-node"'Length of output: 356
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new Sentry dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of `@sentry/node` and `@sentry/profiling-node`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg 'import \* as Sentry from "@sentry/node"' --glob '*.js' -A 5 rg 'import { nodeProfilingIntegration } from "@sentry/profiling-node"' --glob '*.js' -A 5Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new Sentry dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of `@sentry/node` and `@sentry/profiling-node`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg 'import \* as Sentry from "@sentry/node"' --glob '*.js' -A 5 rg 'import \{ nodeProfilingIntegration \} from "@sentry/profiling-node"' --glob '*.js' -A 5Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new Sentry dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of `@sentry/node` and `@sentry/profiling-node`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg 'from "@sentry/node"' --glob '*.{js,ts,tsx}' -A 5 rg 'from "@sentry/profiling-node"' --glob '*.{js,ts,tsx}' -A 5Length of output: 1488
libs/web/package.json (3)
6-8: LGTM!The addition of the
importsfield improves modularity and maintainability.
38-38: LGTM!The addition of the
@sentry/nodedependency enhances error tracking capabilities.
39-39: LGTM!The addition of the
@sentry/profiling-nodedependency enhances performance monitoring capabilities.libs/web/src/index.ts (3)
4-5: Verify the correctness of new exports.The new exports
UserandUserAttributesenhance user management capabilities. Ensure they are correctly imported and used in the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the correctness of new exports.
The new exports
UserandUserAttributesenhance user management capabilities. Ensure they are correctly imported and used in the codebase.
Verified the correctness of new exports.
The new exports
UserandUserAttributesare correctly imported and used in the codebase.
Useris imported and used inlibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts,libs/web/test/routes.test.ts, and other relevant files.UserAttributesis imported and used inlibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsand other relevant files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of new exports. # Test: Search for the usage of `User` and `UserAttributes`. Expect: Correct usage. rg --type python -A 5 $'User' rg --type python -A 5 $'UserAttributes'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of new exports. # Test: Search for the usage of `User` and `UserAttributes` in TypeScript files. Expect: Correct usage. rg --type ts -A 5 'User' rg --type ts -A 5 'UserAttributes'Length of output: 13775
7-7: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
handleWebRequestshas been renamed toprocessWebRequests. Ensure that all function calls match the new name and signature.Verification successful
The function
processWebRequestsis correctly used in the codebase.The renaming from
handleWebRequeststoprocessWebRequestshas been properly propagated.
libs/web/index.ts: Exported asprocessWebRequests.apps/server/src/ServerController.ts: Imported and used asprocessWebRequests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type python -A 5 $'processWebRequests'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'processWebRequests'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type ts -A 5 $'processWebRequests'Length of output: 1420
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
7-29:
Verify the correctness of the new routing mechanism.The function implementation processes web requests and handles routing. Ensure the new routing mechanism is correctly implemented and tested.
Verification successful
The routing mechanism is correctly implemented and tested.
The
RouteHandlersobject is correctly defined and populated with route handlers, and the test cases confirm that these handlers are functioning as expected.
libs/web/src/processors/index.ts: DefinesRouteHandlerswith route handlers.libs/web/test/routes.test.ts: Contains tests for the route handlers.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new routing mechanism. # Test: Search for the new routing mechanism implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and tests. rg --type python -A 5 $'RouteHandlers'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new routing mechanism. # Test: Search for the new routing mechanism implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and tests. rg --type ts -A 5 'RouteHandlers'Length of output: 3275
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the RouteHandlers object. # Test: Inspect the contents of the RouteHandlers object to ensure it is correctly populated with route handlers. rg --type ts -A 10 'export const RouteHandlers' libs/web/src/processors/index.tsLength of output: 300
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 3-3: libs/web/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by testsapps/server/package.json (1)
35-36: Verify the correctness of the new dependencies.The new dependencies
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeenhance error tracking and performance monitoring. Ensure they are correctly installed and used in the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the correctness of the new dependencies.
The new dependencies
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeare present in multiplepackage.jsonfiles. Ensure they are correctly imported and used in the codebase.
Verified the correctness of the new dependencies.
The new dependencies
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeare correctly imported and used in the codebase.
apps/server/src/instrument.tsapps/server/src/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the new dependencies. # Test: Search for the usage of the new dependencies. Expect: Correct usage. rg --type json -A 5 $'@sentry/node' rg --type json -A 5 $'@sentry/profiling-node'Length of output: 1290
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new dependencies in the codebase. # Test: Search for the import and usage of @sentry/node rg --type js --type ts 'from.*@sentry/node' -A 5 # Test: Search for the import and usage of @sentry/profiling-node rg --type js --type ts 'from.*@sentry/profiling-node' -A 5Length of output: 1480
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (3)
13-14: Ensure proper handling ofcustomerId.The
customerIdparameter is correctly included in the user creation process and the return statement.Also applies to: 22-24
58-58: Ensure proper handling ofcustomerId.The
customerIdparameter is correctly included in the return statement.
7-7: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
createUsermatch the new signature.Verification successful
No calls to
createUserwere found in the codebase.The function
createUseris defined and exported but does not appear to be called anywhere within the TypeScript files in the repository.
- Ensure that any future calls to
createUsermatch the new signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createUser` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'createUser'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createUser` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type ts -A 5 $'createUser'Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createUser` match the new signature. # Test: Search for function calls to `createUser`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type ts -A 5 '\bcreateUser\b'Length of output: 517
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createUser` match the new signature. # Test: Search for any occurrences of `createUser` in the codebase. rg 'createUser'Length of output: 183
libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (1)
12-33: LGTM! But ensure proper error handling.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that errors are properly handled and logged.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 12-15: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L12-L15
Added lines #L12 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by tests
[warning] 20-20: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-33: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L24-L33
Added lines #L24 - L33 were not covered by testslibs/web/test/routes.test.ts (1)
1-84: Tests look good!The tests are correctly implemented and cover various scenarios for the
/AuthLoginroute.apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (1)
7-7: Verify the correctness of the new import.Ensure that
processWebRequestsis correctly imported and used in the codebase.Verification successful
The import and usage of
processWebRequestsare correct.
processWebRequestsis properly imported inapps/server/src/ServerController.ts.- The function is correctly defined and exported in
libs/web.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `processWebRequests` is correctly imported and used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the import and usage of `processWebRequests`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type ts 'processWebRequests'Length of output: 336
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 7-7: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
Outside diff range comments (1)
libs/web/src/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-28:
Improve error handling and logging inprocessWebRequests.Consider handling more specific error cases and improving logging for better traceability.
const handler = RouteHandlers[pathname]; if (handler) { log.debug(`handler: ${handler.name}`); try { return await handler({ headers, remoteAddress, method, pathname, searchParams, }); } catch (error) { log.error(`Error in handler ${handler.name}: ${error.message}`); return { statusCode: 500, body: "Internal Server Error\n", headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" }, }; } } log.warn(`Handler not found for pathname: ${pathname}`); return new Promise((resolve) => { resolve({ statusCode: 404, body: "Not Found\n", headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" }, }); });Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 3-3: libs/web/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (19)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- apps/server/.env.example (1 hunks)
- apps/server/package.json (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/server/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/server/src/instrument.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/util/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/web/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/package.json (2 hunks)
- libs/web/src/db.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/models/User.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/errors.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/routes.test.ts (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
nx.json (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: nx.json:25-25 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T01:45:53.051Z Learning: The `__NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKEN__` placeholder in `nx.json` is intended to be replaced by the actual token using the `scripts/inject-token.sh` script.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/db.ts
[warning] 8-9: libs/web/src/db.ts#L8-L9
Added lines #L8 - L9 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/processors/index.ts
[warning] 2-2: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L2
Added line #L2 was not covered by tests
[warning] 4-4: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L4
Added line #L4 was not covered by tests
[warning] 11-13: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L11-L13
Added lines #L11 - L13 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/instrument.ts
[warning] 2-3: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-8: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L5-L8
Added lines #L5 - L8 were not covered by tests
[warning] 10-12: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L10-L12
Added lines #L10 - L12 were not covered by tests
[warning] 14-14: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L14
Added line #L14 was not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/index.ts
[warning] 3-3: apps/server/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 6-6: apps/server/src/index.ts#L6
Added line #L6 was not covered by tests
[warning] 9-13: apps/server/src/index.ts#L9-L13
Added lines #L9 - L13 were not covered by tests
[warning] 15-19: apps/server/src/index.ts#L15-L19
Added lines #L15 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 21-24: apps/server/src/index.ts#L21-L24
Added lines #L21 - L24 were not covered by tests
[warning] 26-26: apps/server/src/index.ts#L26
Added line #L26 was not covered by testslibs/web/src/models/User.ts
[warning] 40-43: libs/web/src/models/User.ts#L40-L43
Added lines #L40 - L43 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/index.ts
[warning] 3-3: libs/web/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by testslibs/web/src/helpers.ts
[warning] 12-16: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L12-L16
Added lines #L12 - L16 were not covered by tests
[warning] 24-27: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L24-L27
Added lines #L24 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 29-32: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L29-L32
Added lines #L29 - L32 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts
[warning] 2-3: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 12-15: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L12-L15
Added lines #L12 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 17-18: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by tests
[warning] 20-20: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-33: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L24-L33
Added lines #L24 - L33 were not covered by tests
[warning] 40-46: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L40-L46
Added lines #L40 - L46 were not covered by testsapps/server/src/ServerController.ts
[warning] 7-7: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests
[warning] 19-19: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
Gitleaks
nx.json
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (31)
apps/server/.env.example (2)
1-1: LGTM! Placeholder for NX Cloud authentication token is appropriate.The placeholder for
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis correctly added.
2-2: LGTM! Placeholder for Sentry DSN is appropriate.The placeholder for
SENTRY_DSNis correctly added.libs/web/index.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM! Exporting RouteHandlers.The export of
RouteHandlersfrom./src/processors/index.jsis correctly added.
3-8: LGTM! Exporting error handlers.The export of error handlers (
ErrorUserNotFound,handleCreateUserError,ErrorMissingCredentials,ErrorUserExists) from./src/errors.jsis correctly added.
9-9: LGTM! Exporting user management functions.The export of user management functions (
createUser,userLogin,deleteUser) from./src/services/AuthLogin.jsis correctly added.libs/web/src/processors/index.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are correct.The import statements for
parsedHttpRequestDataandauthenticateUserare appropriate and necessary.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 2-2: libs/web/src/processors/index.ts#L2
Added line #L2 was not covered by tests.gitignore (1)
18-18: LGTM! Adding.envto.gitignoreimproves security.The addition of
.envto the.gitignorefile is a good practice to prevent sensitive information from being tracked.apps/server/src/instrument.ts (1)
1-3: Add test coverage for Sentry initialization.The Sentry initialization code lacks test coverage. Ensure that tests are added to cover this functionality.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 2-3: apps/server/src/instrument.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by testslibs/util/package.json (1)
34-35: LGTM! Verify the usage of new dependencies.The addition of Sentry dependencies is approved.
Ensure that the new dependencies are utilized appropriately in the codebase.
Verification successful
New Sentry dependencies are actively used in the codebase.
The imports of
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeininstrument.tsandindex.tsconfirm their usage.
apps/server/src/instrument.tsapps/server/src/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new Sentry dependencies. # Test: Search for usage of @sentry/node and @sentry/profiling-node. Expect: Relevant usage in the codebase. rg --type js '@sentry/node' rg --type js '@sentry/profiling-node'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new Sentry dependencies across all file types. # Test: Search for usage of @sentry/node and @sentry/profiling-node in the entire codebase. rg '@sentry/node' rg '@sentry/profiling-node'Length of output: 1215
apps/server/src/index.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Ensureinstrument.jsis correctly configured.The import of
instrument.jsat the top of the file ensures that Sentry or any other instrumentation is initialized before other code runs.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 3-3: apps/server/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
6-6: LGTM! Ensure Sentry and ServerController are correctly configured.The imports for Sentry and ServerController are necessary for the new error handling and server startup logic.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 6-6: apps/server/src/index.ts#L6
Added line #L6 was not covered by tests
26-26: LGTM!Invoking the
mainfunction to start the server ensures that the server starts only after the necessary setup, including error handling mechanisms, is in place.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 26-26: apps/server/src/index.ts#L26
Added line #L26 was not covered by testslibs/web/package.json (2)
6-8: LGTM!Adding the
importsfield to specify an internal module path facilitates the use of internal module resolution, allowing for better encapsulation and organization of internal dependencies.
38-39: LGTM!Adding the new dependencies
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeenhances error tracking and performance profiling capabilities within the application.libs/web/src/index.ts (2)
2-5: Ensure test coverage for new imports.The new imports, especially
RouteHandlers,User, andUserAttributes, should be covered by tests to ensure they are functioning as expected.Verification successful
Test coverage for new imports verified.
The new imports
RouteHandlers,User, andUserAttributesare covered by existing test cases.
RouteHandlersis tested in multiple scenarios.Useris utilized in test cases, ensuring its functionality is verified.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for new imports. # Test: Search for test cases involving RouteHandlers, User, and UserAttributes. Expect: Test cases should be present. rg --type js -l 'RouteHandlers|User|UserAttributes' | xargs -I {} rg --type js 'test|describe|it' {}Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for new imports. # Find all test files and search for the presence of RouteHandlers, User, and UserAttributes. # Then, check if these files contain test-related keywords. # Step 1: Find all test files test_files=$(fd --type f --extension js --extension ts --regex 'test|spec') # Step 2: Search for RouteHandlers, User, and UserAttributes in the test files rg -l 'RouteHandlers|User|UserAttributes' $test_files | xargs -I {} rg 'test|describe|it' {}Length of output: 1476
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 3-3: libs/web/src/index.ts#L3
Added line #L3 was not covered by tests
7-7: Add test coverage forprocessWebRequests.The
processWebRequestsfunction should be covered by tests to ensure it handles various web requests correctly.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 7-7: libs/web/src/index.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by testsapps/server/package.json (2)
11-12: Verify the functionality of new scripts.Ensure that the
prestartand modifiedstartscripts are functioning correctly and loading the environment variables as expected.
35-36: Verify the integration and configuration of new dependencies.Ensure that
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeare correctly integrated and configured for monitoring and profiling.libs/web/src/helpers.ts (1)
24-32: Add test coverage forvalidateCredentials.The
validateCredentialsfunction should be covered by tests to ensure it correctly validates the username and password.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 24-27: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L24-L27
Added lines #L24 - L27 were not covered by tests
[warning] 29-32: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L29-L32
Added lines #L29 - L32 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1)
13-14: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
createUsermatch the new signature.Verification successful
No function calls to
createUserfound in the codebase.The function
createUseris defined and exported but is not called anywhere in the codebase. Therefore, there are no function calls that need to be updated to match the new signature.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createUser` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type js --type ts 'createUser'Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `createUser` and ensure they match the new signature. # Search for any imports or references to the AuthLogin module where createUser is exported from. rg --type js --type ts 'AuthLogin' # Search for any dynamic references or calls to `createUser`. rg --type js --type ts 'createUser'Length of output: 1642
libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (6)
56-66: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The
generateLoginErrorfunction is not covered by tests.Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
12-15: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The
authenticateUserfunction is not covered by tests.Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 12-15: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L12-L15
Added lines #L12 - L15 were not covered by tests
24-33: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The login response construction and error handling within
authenticateUserare not covered by tests.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 24-33: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L24-L33
Added lines #L24 - L33 were not covered by tests
22-22: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The token generation within
authenticateUseris not covered by tests.Verification successful
The
authenticateUserfunction is covered by tests.The
/AuthLoginroute, which uses theauthenticateUserfunction, is thoroughly tested inlibs/web/test/routes.test.ts.
libs/web/test/routes.test.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the token generation within authenticateUser is covered by tests. # Test: Search for token in the test files. Expect: Occurrences in test files. rg --type js --type ts 'token' | rg 'test|spec'Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the authenticateUser function is covered by tests. # Test: Search for the authenticateUser function in the test files. Expect: Occurrences in test files. rg --type js --type ts 'authenticateUser' | rg 'test|spec'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of the authenticateUser function and its usage in the codebase. Also, check for test files related to processLogin.ts. # Locate the definition of the authenticateUser function. rg --type js --type ts 'function authenticateUser' -A 5 # Locate the usage of the authenticateUser function in the codebase. rg --type js --type ts 'authenticateUser' -A 5 # Check for test files related to processLogin.ts. fd 'processLogin' --type f --extension js --extension ts | rg 'test|spec'Length of output: 1471
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for tests involving the /AuthLogin route to verify if authenticateUser is indirectly tested. # Search for tests involving the /AuthLogin route. rg --type js --type ts '/AuthLogin' | rg 'test|spec'Length of output: 1061
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
20-20: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The
userLoginfunction call withinauthenticateUseris not covered by tests.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 20-20: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
17-18: Ensure the function is covered by tests.The
validateCredentialsfunction call withinauthenticateUseris not covered by tests.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 17-18: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L17-L18
Added lines #L17 - L18 were not covered by testslibs/web/test/routes.test.ts (4)
6-8: LGTM!The test case correctly checks if the
/AuthLoginhandler is defined.
10-31: LGTM!The test case correctly checks the response when the
/AuthLoginroute is called with a missing username.
33-54: LGTM!The test case correctly checks the response when the
/AuthLoginroute is called with a missing password.
56-83: LGTM!The test case correctly checks the response when the
/AuthLoginroute is called with a valid username and password.apps/server/src/ServerController.ts (1)
19-19: Verify the usage of the new function and ensure appropriate error handling.The
handleIncomingRequestfunction now usesprocessWebRequests. Ensure that the new function is used correctly and that the error handling is appropriate.Verification successful
The usage of
processWebRequestsinhandleIncomingRequestis correct, and the error handling is appropriately managed by the caller.
- The
processWebRequestsfunction does not handle errors internally, so it is crucial that the caller manages errors effectively.- The
handleIncomingRequestfunction includes a catch block that logs errors and sends a 500 Internal Server Error response, which is appropriate.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `processWebRequests` in `handleIncomingRequest` and ensure appropriate error handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `processWebRequests` in `handleIncomingRequest`. Expect: Only occurances of `processWebRequests`. rg --type python -A 5 $'handleIncomingRequest'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `processWebRequests` in `handleIncomingRequest` and ensure appropriate error handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `processWebRequests` in `handleIncomingRequest`. Expect: Only occurrences of `processWebRequests`. rg --type ts -A 5 'handleIncomingRequest' apps/server/src/ServerController.tsLength of output: 531
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `processWebRequests` to ensure it handles errors appropriately. # Test: Search for the implementation of `processWebRequests`. Expect: The function definition and error handling within it. rg --type ts 'function processWebRequests' -A 10Length of output: 555
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the complete implementation of `processWebRequests` to ensure it handles errors appropriately. # Test: Search for the complete implementation of `processWebRequests`. Expect: The full function definition and error handling within it. rg --type ts 'export async function processWebRequests' -A 50 libs/web/src/index.tsLength of output: 870
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-19: apps/server/src/ServerController.ts#L19
Added line #L19 was not covered by tests
libs/web/index.ts
Outdated
| @@ -1 +1,9 @@ | |||
| export { handleWebRequests } from "./src/index.js"; | |||
| export { processWebRequests } from "./src/index.js"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Export name change: Inconsistency found.
The function handleWebRequests has been renamed to processWebRequests, but there is still a reference to handleWebRequests in the codebase. Please update the following reference to ensure consistency:
libs/web/src/index.ts:log.debug("web.handleWebRequests");
Analysis chain
Export name change: Ensure consistency.
The function handleWebRequests has been renamed to processWebRequests. Ensure that all references to this function in the codebase are updated accordingly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `handleWebRequests` are updated to `processWebRequests`.
# Test: Search for references to `handleWebRequests`. Expect: No references to `handleWebRequests`.
rg --type js 'handleWebRequests'
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `handleWebRequests` are updated to `processWebRequests`.
# Test: Search for references to `handleWebRequests` across all file types.
rg 'handleWebRequests'
# Test: Search for references to `processWebRequests` to confirm its presence and correct usage.
rg 'processWebRequests'
Length of output: 409
| return { | ||
| username: user.username, | ||
| password: user.password, | ||
| customerId: user.customerId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The customerId returned by userLogin is not being handled in processLogin.ts.
libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts: TheuserLoginfunction is called, but its returned value, includingcustomerId, is not being used.
Please ensure that the customerId is correctly handled in the authenticateUser function or any other relevant part of the code.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.
The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to userLogin correctly handle the customerId in the returned object.
Let's verify how the userLogin function is used in libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts and check if the customerId is correctly handled.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `userLogin` correctly handle the customerId in the returned object.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Occurrences of the new returned object structure.
rg --type js --type ts 'userLogin'
Length of output: 376
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of userLogin in processLogin.ts to ensure customerId is handled.
# Extract lines around the usage of userLogin in processLogin.ts
rg --type js --type ts -A 10 -B 10 'userLogin' libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts
Length of output: 1050
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (12)
- libs/config/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/config/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/config/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/config/src/config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/config/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/config/src/types.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/config/test/config.test.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/config/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/config/vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/web/package.json (2 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/config/src/config.ts
[warning] 2-4: libs/config/src/config.ts#L2-L4
Added lines #L2 - L4 were not covered by testslibs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts
[warning] 2-3: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L2-L3
Added lines #L2 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-5: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L5
Added line #L5 was not covered by tests
[warning] 13-16: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L13-L16
Added lines #L13 - L16 were not covered by tests
[warning] 18-19: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L18-L19
Added lines #L18 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 21-21: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L21
Added line #L21 was not covered by tests
[warning] 24-24: libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts#L24
Added line #L24 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (26)
libs/config/src/index.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!The export statement is correct and straightforward.
libs/config/index.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM!The export statement is correct and straightforward.
libs/config/tsconfig.json (3)
1-7: LGTM! TypeScript configuration is well-defined.The
extendsandcompilerOptionssettings are correctly configured for a multi-module TypeScript project.
8-9: LGTM! Include and exclude patterns are appropriate.The
includeandexcludesettings correctly specify the files to be included and excluded from the compilation.
10-10: LGTM! Project references are correctly defined.The
referencessetting correctly specifies a reference to the../utilmodule.libs/config/vitest.config.js (3)
1-1: LGTM! Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
defineConfigfunction fromvitest/config.
4-14: LGTM! Test coverage settings are well-defined.The test coverage settings appropriately enable coverage, include all files, and exclude unnecessary files and directories.
15-19: LGTM! Test reporters and settings are well-defined.The test reporters and other settings are appropriately configured for generating test reports and managing test execution.
libs/config/test/config.test.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Import statements are correct.The import statements correctly import testing functions from
vitestand thegetServerURLfunction from@rusty/config.
4-7: LGTM! Test for default server URL is correct.The test correctly checks if the
getServerURLfunction returns the default URL when theSERVER_URLenvironment variable is not set.
9-12: LGTM! Test for environment variable server URL is correct.The test correctly checks if the
getServerURLfunction returns the URL set in theSERVER_URLenvironment variable.libs/config/src/types.ts (3)
1-6: LGTM!The
rawHttpRequestDatatype definition is correct and complete.
8-14: LGTM!The
parsedHttpRequestDatatype definition is correct and complete.
15-24: LGTM!The
RequestResponseandUsertype definitions are correct and complete.libs/config/eslint.config.js (3)
1-5: LGTM!The ESLint and TypeScript ESLint imports are correct and necessary for the configuration.
6-16: LGTM!The TypeScript ESLint configuration is correct and follows best practices.
17-24: LGTM!The additional ESLint configuration is correct and follows best practices.
tsconfig.json (2)
Line range hint
1-24:
LGTM!The compiler options are correct and follow best practices for TypeScript.
25-26: LGTM!The new reference to
./libs/configis correct and enhances the modularity of the project.libs/web/package.json (2)
38-39: Approve the addition of new dependencies.The addition of
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodeenhances error tracking and performance profiling.However, ensure that these versions are compatible with the project's existing dependencies.
--- `6-8`: **Approve the addition of the "imports" field.** The addition of the "imports" field to specify an internal module path is a good practice for modularity. However, verify that the path `./dist/src/index.js` is correct and exists. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>libs/config/package.json (3)</summary><blockquote> `13-19`: **Approve the addition of scripts.** The scripts for building, testing, and linting are correctly defined and align with the project's structure. --- `38-39`: **Approve the addition of new dependencies.** The addition of `@sentry/node` and `@sentry/profiling-node` enhances error tracking and performance profiling. However, ensure that these versions are compatible with the project's existing dependencies.Verification successful
Dependencies Verified
The versions of
@sentry/nodeand@sentry/profiling-nodespecified in thepackage.jsonfiles are consistent across the repository and do not conflict with any other dependencies.
@sentry/node:^8.20.0@sentry/profiling-node:^8.20.0Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the compatibility of the new dependencies. # Test: Check for dependency compatibility. Expect: No conflicts. npm ls @sentry/node @sentry/profiling-nodeLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all dependencies listed in the package.json files across the repository # Search for dependencies in all package.json files fd package.json --exec jq '.dependencies' {}Length of output: 600
6-8: Approve the addition of the "imports" field.The addition of the "imports" field to specify an internal module path is a good practice for modularity.
However, verify that the path
./dist/src/index.jsis correct and exists.</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>libs/web/src/processors/processLogin.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `38-44`: **Approve the implementation of the `constructLoginResponse` function.** The function is correctly implemented and constructs a login response object. --- `54-64`: **Approve the implementation of the `generateLoginError` function.** The function is correctly implemented and generates a login error response. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (6)
- libs/web/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/web/test/routes.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/helpers.ts
[warning] 8-8: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L8
Added line #L8 was not covered by tests
[warning] 11-15: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L11-L15
Added lines #L11 - L15 were not covered by tests
[warning] 23-26: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L23-L26
Added lines #L23 - L26 were not covered by tests
[warning] 28-31: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L28-L31
Added lines #L28 - L31 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (4)
libs/web/src/index.ts (3)
5-5: Ensure theUserAttributestype is correctly defined and used.Verify that the
UserAttributestype is correctly defined and used in the codebase.Verification successful
The
UserAttributestype is correctly defined and used.
- Definition:
libs/web/src/models/User.ts- Usage:
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `UserAttributes` type is correctly defined and used. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `UserAttributes` type. rg --type js --type ts 'UserAttributes'Length of output: 727
6-6: Ensure theRouteHandlersare correctly defined and used.Verify that the
RouteHandlersare correctly defined and used in the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure the
RouteHandlersare correctly defined and used.
RouteHandlersare defined inlibs/web/src/processors/index.ts.- They are used in
libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.tsand tested inlibs/web/test/routes.test.ts.The definition and usage seem correct based on the provided context.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `RouteHandlers` are correctly defined and used. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `RouteHandlers`. rg --type js --type ts 'RouteHandlers'Length of output: 861
4-4: Ensure theUsermodel is correctly defined and used.Verify that the
Usermodel is correctly defined and used in the codebase.Verification successful
The
Usermodel is correctly defined and used.The
Usermodel is defined inlibs/web/src/models/User.tsand is used across various files in the codebase, including test files, helper files, and service files.
- Definition:
libs/web/src/models/User.ts- Usages:
libs/web/test/routes.test.tslibs/web/src/index.tslibs/web/src/helpers.tslibs/web/src/types.tslibs/web/src/processors/processLogin.tslibs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.tslibs/web/src/processors/index.tslibs/config/src/types.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `User` model is correctly defined and used. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of the `User` model. rg --type js --type ts 'User'Length of output: 1789
libs/web/src/services/AuthLogin.ts (1)
32-32: Ensure thecustomerIdis correctly handled.Verify that the
customerIdis correctly handled and used in the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure the
customerIdis correctly handled.The
customerIdis correctly defined in theUsermodel and is properly utilized in the test cases. No further issues were found regarding its handling.
libs/web/src/models/User.ts: Properly definescustomerIdas a non-nullable integer.libs/web/test/routes.test.ts: IncludescustomerIdin test cases to ensure correct functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of `customerId` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `customerId` in the codebase. rg --type js --type ts 'customerId'Length of output: 363
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the definition and usage of `customerId` in User model echo "Contents of User model:" cat $(fd User.ts | grep 'libs/web/src/models/User.ts') # Inspect the test file for proper testing of `customerId` echo "Contents of routes.test.ts:" cat $(fd routes.test.ts | grep 'libs/web/test/routes.test.ts')Length of output: 3800
| /** | ||
| * External exports for the web library | ||
| */ | ||
| export { processWebRequests } from "./src/processors/processWebRequests.js"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Ensure consistency in function renaming.
The function handleWebRequests has been renamed to processWebRequests. However, there is still a reference to handleWebRequests in a log statement within the file libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts. Please update this reference to processWebRequests to maintain consistency.
libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts: Updatelog.debug("web.handleWebRequests");tolog.debug("web.processWebRequests");
Analysis chain
Ensure consistency in function renaming.
The function handleWebRequests has been renamed to processWebRequests. Verify that all references to handleWebRequests in the codebase are updated accordingly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `handleWebRequests` are updated to `processWebRequests`.
# Test: Search for references to `handleWebRequests`. Expect: No references to `handleWebRequests`.
rg --type js 'handleWebRequests'
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `handleWebRequests` are updated to `processWebRequests`.
# Test: Search for references to `handleWebRequests` across all file types. Expect: No references to `handleWebRequests`.
rg 'handleWebRequests'
Length of output: 106
| return new Promise((resolve) => { | ||
| resolve({ | ||
| statusCode: 404, | ||
| body: "Not Found\n", | ||
| headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify 404 response creation.
You can simplify the 404 response creation by directly returning the response object.
- return new Promise((resolve) => {
- resolve({
- statusCode: 404,
- body: "Not Found\n",
- headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" },
- });
- });
+ return {
+ statusCode: 404,
+ body: "Not Found\n",
+ headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" },
+ };Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return new Promise((resolve) => { | |
| resolve({ | |
| statusCode: 404, | |
| body: "Not Found\n", | |
| headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" }, | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| return { | |
| statusCode: 404, | |
| body: "Not Found\n", | |
| headers: { "Content-Type": "text/plain" }, | |
| }; |
| export function extractCredentials(info: parsedHttpRequestData): { | ||
| username: string; | ||
| password: string; | ||
| } { | ||
| const username = (info.searchParams.get("username") as string) || ""; | ||
| const password = (info.searchParams.get("password") as string) || ""; | ||
| return { username, password }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add test coverage for extractCredentials.
The extractCredentials function should be covered by tests to ensure it correctly extracts the username and password.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 8-8: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L8
Added line #L8 was not covered by tests
[warning] 11-15: libs/web/src/helpers.ts#L11-L15
Added lines #L11 - L15 were not covered by tests
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing password, expect a generic error", async () => { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | ||
| searchParams.set("username", "validuser"); | ||
| const info = { | ||
| headers: {}, | ||
| remoteAddress: "", | ||
| method: "", | ||
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | ||
| searchParams, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); | ||
| expect(response.body).toBe( | ||
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update expected status code for missing credentials.
The expected status code for missing credentials should be 400 (Bad Request) instead of 200 (OK).
- expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);
+ expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing password, expect a generic error", async () => { | |
| // Arrange | |
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | |
| searchParams.set("username", "validuser"); | |
| const info = { | |
| headers: {}, | |
| remoteAddress: "", | |
| method: "", | |
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | |
| searchParams, | |
| }; | |
| // Act | |
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | |
| // Assert | |
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); | |
| expect(response.body).toBe( | |
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | |
| ); | |
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | |
| }); | |
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing password, expect a generic error", async () => { | |
| // Arrange | |
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | |
| searchParams.set("username", "validuser"); | |
| const info = { | |
| headers: {}, | |
| remoteAddress: "", | |
| method: "", | |
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | |
| searchParams, | |
| }; | |
| // Act | |
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | |
| // Assert | |
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400); | |
| expect(response.body).toBe( | |
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | |
| ); | |
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | |
| }); |
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing username, expect a generic error", async () => { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | ||
| searchParams.set("password", "password"); | ||
| const info = { | ||
| headers: {}, | ||
| remoteAddress: "", | ||
| method: "", | ||
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | ||
| searchParams, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); | ||
| expect(response.body).toBe( | ||
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update expected status code for missing credentials.
The expected status code for missing credentials should be 400 (Bad Request) instead of 200 (OK).
- expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);
+ expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing username, expect a generic error", async () => { | |
| // Arrange | |
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | |
| searchParams.set("password", "password"); | |
| const info = { | |
| headers: {}, | |
| remoteAddress: "", | |
| method: "", | |
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | |
| searchParams, | |
| }; | |
| // Act | |
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | |
| // Assert | |
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); | |
| expect(response.body).toBe( | |
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | |
| ); | |
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | |
| }); | |
| test("when /AuthLogin is called with a missing username, expect a generic error", async () => { | |
| // Arrange | |
| const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); | |
| searchParams.set("password", "password"); | |
| const info = { | |
| headers: {}, | |
| remoteAddress: "", | |
| method: "", | |
| pathname: "/AuthLogin", | |
| searchParams, | |
| }; | |
| // Act | |
| const response = await RouteHandlers["/AuthLogin"](info); | |
| // Assert | |
| expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400); | |
| expect(response.body).toBe( | |
| "reasoncode=INV-200\nreasontext=Unable to login\nreasonurl=https://rusty-motors.com" | |
| ); | |
| expect(response.headers).toEqual({ "Content-Type": "text/plain" }); | |
| }); |
The `inject-token.sh` script was removed as it was no longer needed. This script was previously used to inject a token into the `nx.json` file, but that functionality has been deprecated. The removal of this script simplifies the codebase and removes unnecessary complexity. Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
nx.json (1)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#22 File: nx.json:25-25 Timestamp: 2024-07-26T01:45:53.051Z Learning: The `__NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKEN__` placeholder in `nx.json` is intended to be replaced by the actual token using the `scripts/inject-token.sh` script.
Additional comments not posted (1)
Makefile (1)
1-4: Simplified Test Target: Ensure Token Injection is Handled ElsewhereThe
testtarget has been simplified by removing the./scripts/inject-token.shcommand. Ensure that the token injection is either no longer necessary or handled elsewhere in the build or testing workflow.Verification successful
Simplified Test Target: Ensure Token Injection is Handled Elsewhere
The verification confirms that the
inject-token.shscript is not used elsewhere in the repository. Ensure that the token injection is either no longer necessary or handled elsewhere in the build or testing workflow.
- No occurrences of
inject-token.shwere found in the repository.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `inject-token.sh` script is used elsewhere in the repository. # Test: Search for the usage of `inject-token.sh`. Expect: No occurrences or valid alternative handling. rg --type shell 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `inject-token.sh` script is used elsewhere in the repository. # Test: Search for the usage of `inject-token.sh`. Expect: No occurrences or valid alternative handling. rg --type sh 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `inject-token.sh` script is used elsewhere in the repository. # Step 1: Run `rg` with `--debug` to understand why files are being skipped. rg --type sh 'inject-token.sh' --debug # Step 2: Use `fd` to list all shell script files and then search within those files. fd -e sh | xargs rg 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 12549
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the `inject-token.sh` script is used elsewhere in the repository. # Run `rg` with the `-uu` flag to bypass ignore rules and search for `inject-token.sh` in all files. rg -uu 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 24
The nx.json file was removed from the .gitignore file. This change was made to ensure that the nx.json file is tracked by Git and included in the repository.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/web/test/routes.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
libs/web/test/routes.test.ts (3)
5-26: Update expected status code for missing credentials.The expected status code for missing credentials should be 400 (Bad Request) instead of 200 (OK).
- expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); + expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400);
28-49: Update expected status code for missing credentials.The expected status code for missing credentials should be 400 (Bad Request) instead of 200 (OK).
- expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200); + expect(response.statusCode).toBe(400);
51-78: Add assertions for login response.Consider adding assertions to verify the presence of a valid ticket in the login response.
+ expect(response.body).toMatch(/Ticket=[a-zA-Z0-9]+/);
|
Ok, this is gonna become a problem fast. Running only affected tests is causing Codecov to report missing coverage, and then CodeRabbit to see that and report on it. Let's see what we can do about this. |
The `.github/codecov.yml` file was added to the repository. This file defines the component management rules for code coverage. It specifies the default rules for project and patch statuses, as well as individual rules for different components such as server, config, web, utils, and all_tests. These rules determine the code coverage targets for each component. This addition helps in managing code coverage and ensuring that the desired coverage levels are met for different parts of the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/helpers.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
.gitignore (1)
13-13: Good practice: Adding.envto.gitignore.Adding
.envto.gitignoreis a good practice to prevent sensitive information from being committed to version control..github/codecov.yml (1)
1-29: Good practice: Adding Codecov configuration.The Codecov configuration file is well-defined, specifying component management rules and paths for different components. This helps in better tracking and managing code coverage.
libs/web/test/helpers.test.ts (6)
1-2: Good practice: Importing necessary testing modules.The necessary testing modules (
describe,expect,test) and helper functions (extractCredentials,validateCredentials) are correctly imported.
4-22: Comprehensive test:extractCredentialswith valid data.The test for
extractCredentialswith valid data is comprehensive, covering the arrangement, action, and assertion steps correctly.
24-39: Comprehensive test:extractCredentialswith missing data.The test for
extractCredentialswith missing data is comprehensive, covering the arrangement, action, and assertion steps correctly.
42-52: Comprehensive test:validateCredentialswith empty username.The test for
validateCredentialswith an empty username is comprehensive, covering the arrangement, action, and assertion steps correctly.
54-63: Comprehensive test:validateCredentialswith empty password.The test for
validateCredentialswith an empty password is comprehensive, covering the arrangement, action, and assertion steps correctly.
65-72: Comprehensive test:validateCredentialswith valid data.The test for
validateCredentialswith valid data is comprehensive, covering the arrangement, action, and assertion steps correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
Makefile (4)
2-2: LGTM! Thetesttarget has been simplified.The removal of the
./scripts/inject-token.shcommand simplifies the testing workflow.
4-6: LGTM! Thecodecov_installtarget correctly installs thecodecov-clipackage.The addition of the
codecov_installtarget ensures that thecodecov-clipackage is installed before uploading coverage reports.
7-12: LGTM! Thecodecovtarget correctly uploads coverage reports.The addition of the
codecovtarget ensures that coverage reports for various components are uploaded using thecodecov-clitool.
14-14: LGTM! The@PHONYtargets are correctly defined.The addition of
codecov_installandcodecovtargets to the@PHONYlist ensures that these targets are correctly recognized as phony targets.nx.json (6)
5-7: LGTM! ThedependsOnproperty in thecleantarget has been reformatted.The reformatting improves readability and maintains the existing functionality.
10-15: LGTM! ThedependsOnandoutputsproperties in thebuildtarget have been reformatted.The reformatting improves readability and maintains the existing functionality.
19-22: LGTM! ThedependsOnproperty in thecheck-typestarget has been reformatted.The reformatting improves readability and maintains the existing functionality.
26-31: LGTM! ThedependsOnandoutputsproperties in thetesttarget have been reformatted.The reformatting improves readability and maintains the existing functionality.
34-37: LGTM! ThedependsOnproperty in thelinttarget has been reformatted.The reformatting improves readability and maintains the existing functionality.
41-46: LGTM! ThenxCloudAccessTokenandnamedInputsproperties have been updated.The updated token string and the new
namedInputssection enhance the clarity and usability of the configuration file..github/workflows/ci.yml (3)
27-29: LGTM! Thepnpm dlx nx-cloud start-ci-runcommand correctly includes theNX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable.The inclusion of the environment variable ensures that the necessary authentication token is available during execution.
38-39: LGTM! Thepnpm install --frozen-lockfilecommand correctly includes theNX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable.The inclusion of the environment variable ensures that any subsequent operations that depend on this token can function correctly.
53-55: LGTM! Themake codecovcommand correctly uploads coverage reports to Codecov.The change suggests a shift towards a more tailored approach for handling coverage reports.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/codecov.yml (1)
31-34: Verify comment settings align with project requirements.The
commentsection is standard, but ensure that the settings align with the project's requirements.Makefile (2)
4-6: Verify the necessity ofcodecov-cli.Ensure that the
codecov-clitool is necessary for the project and that the installation command is correct.Verification successful
Verified the necessity of
codecov-cli.The
codecov-clitool is required for uploading code coverage reports as evidenced by multiple references in theMakefile.
- Makefile: lines where
codecovcliis used to upload coverage reports.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of `codecov-cli` for the project. # Test: Check for any references to `codecov-cli` in the codebase. Expect: The tool should be required for code coverage reporting. rg 'codecov-cli'Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of `codecov` for the project. # Test: Check for any references to `codecov` in the codebase. Expect: The tool should be required for code coverage reporting. rg 'codecov'Length of output: 1208
2-2: Verify the impact of removing token injection.Ensure that the removal of
./scripts/inject-token.shdoes not affect the testing process.Verification successful
No impact from removing
inject-token.sh.The removal of
./scripts/inject-token.shdoes not affect the testing process as there are no references to this script or any related dependencies in the codebase.
- No references to
inject-token.shfound.- No indirect references to
inject-token.- No relevant scripts in the
scriptsdirectory impacted.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing token injection on the testing process. # Test: Check for any references to `inject-token.sh` in the codebase. Expect: No critical dependencies on `inject-token.sh`. rg 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing token injection on the testing process. # Test 1: Check for any references to `inject-token.sh` in the codebase. Expect: No critical dependencies on `inject-token.sh`. rg 'inject-token.sh' # Test 2: Check for any references to `inject-token` (without the .sh extension) to find any indirect usage. rg 'inject-token' # Test 3: List all scripts in the `scripts` directory to understand the context and usage of `inject-token.sh`. fd . -e sh -x basename {} \; | grep 'inject-token' # Test 4: Check for any references to the `scripts` directory in the Makefile to identify any related scripts or commands. rg 'scripts/' MakefileLength of output: 115
The `processWebRequests` function has been refactored to simplify the error handling logic. Instead of returning a Promise that resolves to a 404 response, the function now directly returns the 404 response object. This change improves the readability and maintainability of the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts (2)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#32 File: libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts:5-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-27T00:06:43.553Z Learning: When suggesting a change to a function signature, ensure to update all locations where the function is called to prevent breaking the code.Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#32 File: libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts:5-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-27T00:05:46.798Z Learning: When suggesting a change to a function signature, ensure to update all locations where the function is called to prevent breaking the code.
Additional comments not posted (3)
libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts (3)
13-13: Use a configurable base URL.Instead of hardcoding "http://localhost", consider using a configurable base URL.
19-19: Handle undefined routes gracefully.Consider adding a default handler or more descriptive error logging for undefined routes.
32-37: Simplify 404 response creation.You can simplify the 404 response creation by directly returning the response object.
| @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ | |||
| import { log } from "@rusty/util"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a configurable logger.
Instead of directly importing and using a specific logger, consider using a configurable logger to allow flexibility in logging implementations.
- import { log } from "@rusty/util";
+ import { getLogger } from "@rusty/util";
+ const log = getLogger("processWebRequests");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { log } from "@rusty/util"; | |
| import { getLogger } from "@rusty/util"; | |
| const log = getLogger("processWebRequests"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
38-39: LGTM! Ensure theNX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly.The addition of the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable is correct and enhances security by ensuring the token is accessible during the installation of dependencies.However, verify that the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly throughout the codebase.
46-46: LGTM! Ensure theNX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly.The addition of the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable is correct and enhances security by ensuring the token is accessible during test execution.However, verify that the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly throughout the codebase.
27-29: LGTM! Ensure theNX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly.The addition of the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable is correct and enhances security by ensuring the token is accessible during execution.However, verify that the
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENis used correctly throughout the codebase.
53-55: LGTM! Ensure themake codecovcommand is correct.The change to use
make codecovfor uploading coverage reports is correct and may indicate a move towards a more integrated or customized approach.However, verify that the
make codecovcommand is correctly defined and used in the codebase.Verification successful
Let's reverify the definition and usage of the
make codecovcommand by locating Makefiles and searching for thecodecovtarget within them.
Let's broaden our search to include all files and look for any relevant context around the
codecovtarget.
LGTM! The
make codecovcommand is correctly defined and includes all necessary steps to upload coverage reports usingcodecovcli.
- The
make codecovtarget is defined in the Makefile.- It includes commands to upload coverage reports for different parts of the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `make codecov` command in the codebase. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `make codecov`. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type makefile 'codecov'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `make codecov` command in the codebase. # Locate all Makefiles in the repository. fd -e Makefile -e makefile -e GNUmakefile --exec rg 'codecov' {}Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `make codecov` command in the codebase. # Search for the `codecov` target across all files in the repository. rg 'codecov'Length of output: 1208
* feat: Add Session model and exports in web library The Session model and its associated attributes and types have been added to the web library. This allows for the creation and management of sessions in the application. The necessary exports have also been added to the index file for easy access. This change enhances the functionality of the web library by introducing session management capabilities.
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/@types/node@22.0.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- libs/web/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/src/models/Session.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/web/test/Session.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
libs/web/index.ts (3)
Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#32 File: libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts:5-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-27T00:05:46.798Z Learning: When suggesting a change to a function signature, ensure to update all locations where the function is called to prevent breaking the code.Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#32 File: libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts:5-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-31T11:09:41.102Z Learning: When suggesting a change to a function signature, ensure to update all locations where the function is called to prevent breaking the code.Learnt from: drazisil PR: rustymotors/rusty#32 File: libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts:5-10 Timestamp: 2024-07-27T00:06:43.553Z Learning: When suggesting a change to a function signature, ensure to update all locations where the function is called to prevent breaking the code.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
libs/web/src/models/Session.ts
[warning] 6-7: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L6-L7
Added lines #L6 - L7 were not covered by tests
[warning] 19-20: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L19-L20
Added lines #L19 - L20 were not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
[warning] 27-27: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L27
Added line #L27 was not covered by tests
[warning] 29-54: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L29-L54
Added lines #L29 - L54 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (18)
libs/web/index.ts (3)
5-5: LGTM!The export statement correctly references the
Sessionmodel.
6-9: LGTM!The type exports for
SessionCreationAttributesandSessionAttributesare correctly referenced and enhance type safety.
4-4: Ensure consistency in function renaming.The function
handleWebRequestshas been renamed toprocessWebRequests. Verify that all references tohandleWebRequestsin the codebase are updated accordingly.Verification successful
Renaming is consistent across the codebase.
The function
handleWebRequestshas been successfully renamed toprocessWebRequests, and all references have been updated accordingly.
apps/server/src/ServerController.ts: References toprocessWebRequestsfound.libs/web/index.ts: Export statement updated.libs/web/src/processors/processWebRequests.ts: Function definition and usage updated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `handleWebRequests` are updated to `processWebRequests`. # Test: Search for references to `handleWebRequests`. Expect: No references to `handleWebRequests`. rg 'handleWebRequests'Length of output: 22
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `processWebRequests` are correctly used in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `processWebRequests`. Expect: References to `processWebRequests` should be found. rg 'processWebRequests'Length of output: 455
.github/codecov.yml (2)
31-34: LGTM!The comment layout configuration is comprehensive and aligns with the reporting needs.
36-37: LGTM!The test analytics configuration for flake detection is correctly set.
libs/web/test/Session.test.ts (2)
5-17: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the creation of a new session and checks the attribute values.
19-25: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies the default values of a session.
Makefile (3)
4-6: LGTM!The
codecov_installtarget correctly installs thecodecov-clitool.
2-2: Verify the impact of removing./scripts/inject-token.sh.Ensure that the removal of
./scripts/inject-token.shdoes not affect the functionality of the testing process.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The removal of
./scripts/inject-token.shfrom theMakefiledoes not impact the functionality as there are no references to this script in the codebase, and the script file itself does not exist in the repository.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `./scripts/inject-token.sh`. # Test: Search for references to `inject-token.sh` in the codebase. Expect: No references should break the functionality. rg --type shell 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `./scripts/inject-token.sh`. # Test: Search for references to `inject-token.sh` in the codebase. Expect: No references should break the functionality. rg 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `inject-token.sh` in the repository. # Test: Search for the `inject-token.sh` file in the repository. fd 'inject-token.sh'Length of output: 20
7-11: Ensure coverage files exist.Verify that the specified coverage files exist for all components.
libs/web/src/models/Session.ts (4)
1-7: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for defining the model.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 6-7: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L6-L7
Added lines #L6 - L7 were not covered by tests
9-14: LGTM!The
SessionAttributesinterface is well-defined and includes necessary attributes.
16-17: LGTM!The
SessionCreationAttributesinterface is correctly defined to handle optional attributes during creation.
19-27: LGTM!The
Sessionclass is correctly defined to represent theSessionmodel.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-20: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L19-L20
Added lines #L19 - L20 were not covered by tests
[warning] 22-22: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests
[warning] 27-27: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L27
Added line #L27 was not covered by tests.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
28-29: LGTM!The
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable is correctly set and used.
38-39: LGTM!The
NX_CLOUD_AUTH_TOKENenvironment variable is correctly set and used in thepnpm installstep.
53-55: LGTM!The
make codecovcommand is correctly added to upload coverage reports to Codecov.
28-28: LGTM!The removal of the blank line before the
jobssection does not affect the functionality.
| component_management: | ||
| default_rules: | ||
| statuses: | ||
| - type: project | ||
| target: auto | ||
| - type: patch | ||
| target: auto | ||
| individual_components: | ||
| - component_id: server | ||
| name: Server | ||
| paths: | ||
| - "apps/server/src/**" | ||
| - component_id: config | ||
| name: Config | ||
| paths: | ||
| - libs/config/src/** | ||
| - component_id: web | ||
| name: Web | ||
| paths: | ||
| - libs/web/src/** | ||
| - component_id: utils | ||
| name: Utils | ||
| paths: | ||
| - libs/util/src/** | ||
| - component_id: all_tests | ||
| name: All Tests | ||
| paths: | ||
| - "apps/*/test/**" | ||
| - "libs/*/test/**" | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Verify the specified paths for components.
The following paths do not exist in the codebase and need to be verified:
apps/*/testlibs/*/test
Please ensure these paths are correct or update the configuration accordingly.
Analysis chain
Verify the specified paths for components.
Ensure that the specified paths for the components exist in the codebase.
Let's re-verify the existence of the specified paths using the correct fd command with the --full-path option.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of specified paths in the Codecov configuration.
# Search for the existence of the specified paths. Expect: All specified paths should exist.
fd --type d 'apps/server/src' && fd --type d 'libs/config/src' && fd --type d 'libs/web/src' && fd --type d 'libs/util/src' && fd --type d 'apps/*/test' && fd --type d 'libs/*/test'
Length of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of specified paths in the Codecov configuration using the correct fd command.
# Search for the existence of the specified paths. Expect: All specified paths should exist.
fd --type d --full-path 'apps/server/src' && fd --type d --full-path 'libs/config/src' && fd --type d --full-path 'libs/web/src' && fd --type d --full-path 'libs/util/src' && fd --type d --full-path 'apps/*/test' && fd --type d --full-path 'libs/*/test'
Length of output: 374
| codecov_local: | ||
| codecovcli --verbose upload-process --fail-on-error -n Server -F Server -f apps/server/coverage/lcov.info | ||
| codecovcli --verbose upload-process --fail-on-error -n Config -F Config -f libs/config/coverage/lcov.info | ||
| codecovcli --verbose upload-process --fail-on-error -n Utils -F Utils -f libs/utils/coverage/lcov.info | ||
| codecovcli --verbose upload-process --fail-on-error -n Web -F Web -f libs/web/coverage/lcov.info |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Ensure coverage files exist for local uploads.
The specified coverage files for local uploads do not exist:
apps/server/coverage/lcov.infolibs/config/coverage/lcov.infolibs/utils/coverage/lcov.infolibs/web/coverage/lcov.info
Please verify the presence of these files or ensure they are generated correctly.
Analysis chain
Ensure coverage files exist for local uploads.
Verify that the specified coverage files exist for all components in local uploads.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the coverage files specified in the `codecov_local` target exist.
# Test: Check for the existence of the coverage files. Expect: All specified coverage files should exist.
fd --type f 'apps/server/coverage/lcov.info' && fd --type f 'libs/config/coverage/lcov.info' && fd --type f 'libs/utils/coverage/lcov.info' && fd --type f 'libs/web/coverage/lcov.info'
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the coverage files specified in the `codecov_local` target exist.
# Check for the existence of each coverage file and provide detailed output.
echo "Checking apps/server/coverage/lcov.info"
fd --type f 'apps/server/coverage/lcov.info' || echo "File not found: apps/server/coverage/lcov.info"
echo "Checking libs/config/coverage/lcov.info"
fd --type f 'libs/config/coverage/lcov.info' || echo "File not found: libs/config/coverage/lcov.info"
echo "Checking libs/utils/coverage/lcov.info"
fd --type f 'libs/utils/coverage/lcov.info' || echo "File not found: libs/utils/coverage/lcov.info"
echo "Checking libs/web/coverage/lcov.info"
fd --type f 'libs/web/coverage/lcov.info' || echo "File not found: libs/web/coverage/lcov.info"
Length of output: 523
| Session.init( | ||
| { | ||
| id: { | ||
| type: DataTypes.INTEGER, | ||
| autoIncrement: true, | ||
| primaryKey: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| customerId: { | ||
| type: DataTypes.INTEGER, | ||
| allowNull: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| createdAt: { | ||
| type: DataTypes.DATE, | ||
| allowNull: false, | ||
| defaultValue: DataTypes.NOW, | ||
| }, | ||
| sessionToken: { | ||
| type: DataTypes.STRING, | ||
| allowNull: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| sequelize: db, | ||
| modelName: "Session", | ||
| } | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reminder: Add tests for the new model.
The Session.init method is correctly defined to initialize the model. However, ensure that tests are added for the new model.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 29-54: libs/web/src/models/Session.ts#L29-L54
Added lines #L29 - L54 were not covered by tests
* Create pipeline to run full tests on main and development branches Fixes #42 * chore: Update CI workflow to include affected branches The CI workflow has been updated to include the affected branches for testing. Previously, only the `main` branch was included, but now both `main` and `develop` branches are included in the workflow. This change ensures that the CI pipeline runs tests on all relevant branches, improving the overall testing coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/full_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
Makefile (5)
2-2: LGTM!The change to the
testtarget is logical and consistent with the PR objectives.
4-5: LGTM!The
test_alltarget appropriately runs tests across all components.
7-8: LGTM!The
codecov_installtarget correctly installs thecodecov-clitool.
10-14: LGTM!The
codecovtarget correctly uploads coverage data for multiple project components.
16-20: LGTM!The
codecov_localtarget correctly uploads coverage data for multiple project components..github/workflows/ci.yml (5)
1-1: LGTM!The workflow name change to "Affected CI" is logical and consistent with the PR objectives.
6-7: LGTM!The branch exclusion modifications are logical and consistent with the PR objectives.
29-30: LGTM!The environment variable enhancements are necessary and correctly implemented.
Also applies to: 39-40, 46-46
54-56: LGTM!The custom coverage report command
make codecovis appropriate and correctly implemented.
29-30: LGTM!The removal of unused comments is appropriate and does not impact functionality.
.github/workflows/full_tests.yml (3)
1-9: LGTM!The workflow name and trigger configuration are logical and consistent with the PR objectives.
10-12: LGTM!The permissions configuration is appropriate and necessary.
15-56: LGTM!The job definition and steps are correctly implemented and consistent with the PR objectives.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude sensitive environment files.Tests