Skip to content

ci: replace Repolinter with centralized compliance checks #24

Open
njjetha wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
njjetha
Open

ci: replace Repolinter with centralized compliance checks #24
njjetha wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
njjetha

Conversation

@njjetha
Copy link

@njjetha njjetha commented Aug 6, 2025

Summary

qcom-preflight-checks calls a reusable-workflow that runs a series of preflight checks on your proposed contribution.

For more info check https://github.com/qualcomm/qcom-actions/blob/main/README.md

@ricardosalveti
Copy link
Contributor

Please explain the reason for the changes as part of the git commit body message.

@njjetha njjetha changed the title Add qcom-prefligh-checks Add qcom-preflight-checks Aug 7, 2025
@njjetha njjetha force-pushed the njjetha branch 2 times, most recently from 27c5a6b to 866d358 Compare August 7, 2025 06:59
njjetha added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
Substitute the repolinter workflow with a comprehensive set of compliance and security checks.
Project-specific exclusions are supported for non-applicable validations.
This update also introduces a centrally-managed reusable workflow to streamline ongoing maintenance and ensure consistency.

Signed-off-by: Neeraj Jetha <[email protected]>
@njjetha njjetha force-pushed the njjetha branch 2 times, most recently from ff44cd6 to acb9909 Compare August 7, 2025 07:06
@njjetha
Copy link
Author

njjetha commented Aug 7, 2025

Please explain the reason for the changes as part of the git commit body message.

Updated the body for GitHub commit message.

@ricardosalveti
Copy link
Contributor

Please explain the reason for the changes as part of the git commit body message.

Updated the body for GitHub commit message.

Thanks, can you wrap the commit message lines to avoid more than 80 columns per line?

@njjetha
Copy link
Author

njjetha commented Aug 11, 2025

Please explain the reason for the changes as part of the git commit body message.

Updated the body for GitHub commit message.

Thanks, can you wrap the commit message lines to avoid more than 80 columns per line?

Resolved in bcdcf3b

Substitute the repolinter workflow with a comprehensive set of
compliance and security checks. Project-specific exclusions are
supported for non-applicable validations. This update also introduces
a centrally-managed reusable workflow to streamline ongoing maintenance
and ensure consistency.

Signed-off-by: Neeraj Jetha <[email protected]>
@njjetha njjetha changed the title Add qcom-preflight-checks ci: replace Repolinter with centralized compliance checks Aug 19, 2025
@jasonpettit
Copy link

Can this PR be closed?

@mynameistechno
Copy link

@njjetha can you update the PR to the latest QC Preflight checks?

@ndechesne @lumag and team, the individual checkers that don't make sense or cause issues can be disabled? If you prefer, we can submit a new PR.

@lumag
Copy link
Contributor

lumag commented Mar 20, 2026

@ndechesne @lumag and team, the individual checkers that don't make sense or cause issues can be disabled?

What is the point of switching to the new workflow if we disable significant parts of it?

If you prefer, we can submit a new PR.

Abandoning the previous review comments? Definitely not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants