-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
feat:Supports Switch plugin #11117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat:Supports Switch plugin #11117
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughNew SwitchComponent introduced for flow control that routes an input message to designated outputs based on text-based case comparison. Includes input handling for Message/Data types, case matching logic, error handling, and dynamic output generation. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touchesImportant Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (1 error, 3 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py (1)
46-76: Consider additional edge case handling.The current implementation may not handle these edge cases gracefully:
- Empty cases list: If
self.casesis empty, the loop won't execute andoutput_namestaysNone.- None value extraction: If
self.switchis neitherMessagenorData,valueremainsNoneand might not match cases as expected.- Type mismatches: The comparison
value == caseuses strict equality, which might not work as expected if types differ (e.g.,"123"vs123).Consider adding validation:
- Ensure
casesis non-empty- Validate that
valuewas successfully extracted- Consider type coercion or explicit type handling for case comparisons
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T19:46:09.104Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: langflow-ai/langflow PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/backend_development.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T19:46:09.104Z
Learning: Applies to src/backend/base/langflow/components/**/*.py : Add new components to the appropriate subdirectory under `src/backend/base/langflow/components/` (agents/, data/, embeddings/, input_output/, models/, processing/, prompts/, tools/, or vectorstores/)
Applied to files:
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py (3)
src/lfx/src/lfx/schema/data.py (1)
Data(26-288)src/lfx/src/lfx/schema/message.py (1)
Message(34-315)src/lfx/src/lfx/custom/custom_component/component.py (7)
_pre_run_setup_if_needed(1171-1173)_handle_tool_mode(1175-1179)_get_outputs_to_process(1191-1219)_get_output_result(1221-1253)_build_artifact(1273-1287)_log_output(1310-1313)_finalize_results(1315-1319)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Ruff Style Check
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py
[error] 39-39: F541 f-string without any placeholders. Ruff check failed during 'uv run --only-dev ruff check --output-format=github .'
🪛 GitHub Check: Ruff Style Check (3.13)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py
[failure] 89-89: Ruff (F541)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:89:28: F541 f-string without any placeholders
[failure] 81-81: Ruff (ARG002)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:81:68: ARG002 Unused method argument: field_value
[failure] 57-57: Ruff (RUF001)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:57:60: RUF001 String contains ambiguous ’ (RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK). Did you mean ``` (GRAVE ACCENT)?
[failure] 57-57: Ruff (RUF001)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:57:55: RUF001 String contains ambiguous ‘ (LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK). Did you mean ``` (GRAVE ACCENT)?
[failure] 57-57: Ruff (EM101)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:57:34: EM101 Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
[failure] 57-57: Ruff (TRY003)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:57:23: TRY003 Avoid specifying long messages outside the exception class
[failure] 56-56: Ruff (Q000)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:56:62: Q000 Single quotes found but double quotes preferred
[failure] 41-41: Ruff (F541)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:41:20: F541 f-string without any placeholders
[failure] 40-40: Ruff (F541)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:40:18: F541 f-string without any placeholders
[failure] 39-39: Ruff (F541)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py:39:26: F541 f-string without any placeholders
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Update Component Index
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/switch.py (4)
1-14: LGTM! Clear component metadata.The imports and class metadata are well-structured and appropriately describe the component's purpose.
15-35: LGTM! Well-defined inputs.The input configuration appropriately handles both Message and Data types, with clear semantics for the switch key and case list.
78-79: LGTM! Appropriate pass-through behavior.The method correctly returns the underlying data dict, allowing the component to route the input data unchanged to the selected output.
9-13: Verify component placement in the repository structure.According to project conventions, new components should be added to appropriate subdirectories under
src/backend/base/langflow/components/. However, this file is located atsrc/lfx/src/lfx/components/flow_controls/.Please confirm that this location is correct for the
lfxmodule structure, or if it should be moved to align with the standard component organization.Based on learnings, components are typically organized under subdirectories like agents/, data/, embeddings/, etc.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.