Skip to content

Conversation

@tempora-mutantur
Copy link

@tempora-mutantur tempora-mutantur commented Jan 3, 2026

Contributes to #2996

Local tests passed for anonymous, individual, and organization modes.


After the change?

CRUD functions were switched to context-aware versions
https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/plugin/sdkv2/guides/v2-upgrade-guide#more-support-for-context-context
*

Pull request checklist

  • Schema migrations have been created if needed (example)
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2026

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

func resourceGithubReleaseCreateUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta any) error {
ctx := context.Background()
if !d.IsNewResource() {
ctx = context.WithValue(ctx, ctxId, d.Id())
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would be grateful if this change could be verified, as I found that there are only writes and no reads of ctxId. I couldn't find the reason why it was added this way from the git history.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While this isn't actively used at this time, I wouldn't remove the context.WithValue call. It could prove to be useful in debugging

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Restored the calls as requested. Thank you.

@tempora-mutantur tempora-mutantur marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2026 19:26
…ctions (integrations#2996)

The legacy CRUD function types are deprecated and should be replaced
with the context-aware versions.
Copy link
Contributor

@deiga deiga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing, thank you! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants