Skip to content

Conversation

@paleolimbot
Copy link
Contributor

@paleolimbot paleolimbot commented Feb 2, 2025

A future version of geoarrow-pyarrow will probably further reduce the dependency on geoarrow-c and/or mandate >- 0.2; however, for the time being this makes it easier for all the CI to hum happily along.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.76923% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.28%. Comparing base (9d591c1) to head (5487da6).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
geoarrow-pyarrow/src/geoarrow/pyarrow/_scalar.py 68.57% 11 Missing ⚠️
geoarrow-pyarrow/src/geoarrow/pyarrow/_kernel.py 89.28% 3 Missing ⚠️
geoarrow-pandas/src/geoarrow/pandas/lib.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #64      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.37%   91.28%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        2168     2179      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         1981     1989       +8     
- Misses        187      190       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@paleolimbot paleolimbot marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 03:56
@paleolimbot paleolimbot merged commit 67e10c7 into geoarrow:main Feb 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@paleolimbot paleolimbot deleted the geoarrow-c-update branch February 3, 2025 03:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant