Open
Conversation
- Refactored the CSS file for the unified comparison table to improve readability and consistency. - Updated the JavaScript file for the comparison table to use modern jQuery and jQuery UI versions. - Removed unnecessary comments and whitespace from the HTML files.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey team,
I’ve made a few improvements to our code to ensure it’s more modern, efficient, and aligned with best practices without affecting production performance.
Changes Made:
<!DOCTYPE html>to HTML5, so it’s compliant with modern standards.meta name="viewport"for better mobile responsiveness.nav,section, andarticletags for better accessibility and separation of content.Code Enhancements:
getValues()function to make the code cleaner and avoid repetition.varwithconstto ensure better scoping and prevent accidental redeclaration.includes('reordered')to avoid redundant operations.Why These Changes?
Cheers!