[SPARK-54834][SQL] Add new interfaces SimpleProcedure and SimpleFunction #53595
+119
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
Member
|
do you plan to add a similar interface for v2 function? |
Contributor
Author
|
good point, I think we should |
pan3793
approved these changes
Dec 24, 2025
cloud-fan
changed the title
pan3793
approved these changes
Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's common that a procedure does not have any overload and the
bindmethod always return the sameBoundProcedure. This PR adds a new interfaceSimpleProcedurefor this use case, which allows people to implement aBoundProceduredirectly without thinking about how to bind. The same applies to v2 functions.Why are the changes needed?
Simplify a common use case when people implement procedures and functions.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it's developer facing
How was this patch tested?
new tests
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
cursor 2.2.43