Skip to content

.NET 6/Fable 3.6 support#5

Open
fc1943s wants to merge 3 commits intoShmew:masterfrom
fc1943s:master
Open

.NET 6/Fable 3.6 support#5
fc1943s wants to merge 3 commits intoShmew:masterfrom
fc1943s:master

Conversation

@fc1943s
Copy link

@fc1943s fc1943s commented Nov 16, 2021

Pull request checklist¹¹

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • Build (fake build or .\build.cmd) on local branch was successful

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Started getting these errors with the new versions (.NET 6/Fable 3.6)

image

image

i hope it doesn't break in the old versions. also the ./build.cmd is erroring with this, probably it will pass on the CI

image

ty!

@fc1943s
Copy link
Author

fc1943s commented Nov 16, 2021

ye the log thing is still happening =( will check.

edit: passing after a 'dotnet paket update' \o/

@jannesiera
Copy link

@Shmew this seems to be blocking us to update to the latest version of Fable because we depend on Feliz.Recoil (which depends on the library, as you know ;) ). What is the status of this PR?

@delneg
Copy link

delneg commented Feb 16, 2022

Maybe it would be a good idea to fork these libs to Fable-compiler or somewhere else ?
@Shmew doesn't seem to be maintaining this one for quite some time

@nikhil-malviya
Copy link

I am also stuck can't update to latest Fable. Might have to fork Feliz.Recoil. @Shmew hope you can merge this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants